A film review by Craig J. Koban October 8, 2010 |
||
THE KILLER INSIDE ME
Casey Affleck: Lou Ford / Kate Hudson: Amy Stanton / Jessica
Alba: Joyce Lakeland / Ned Beatty: Chester Conway / Elias
Koteas: Joe Rothman / Simon Baker: Howard Hendricks |
||
THE KILLER INSIDE contains a quietly
frightening and grotesque performance by Casey Affleck, whom has proven
here – as he did with critical lauded turns in GONE
BABY GONE and THE
ASSASSINATION OF JESSE JAMES BY THE COWARD ROBERT FORD – that he
has emerged from the shadow of his big brother Ben as one of the more
intuitive and nuanced character actors working today.
His previous two films chiefly demonstrated how he could
unassumingly inhabit the minds of his deeply flawed and inwardly tortured
characters, and he has done so by underplaying his roles for just the
right unnerving effect.
This, in turn, makes him that much more of a compelling performer. He once again reveals how completely he can nonchalantly submerge himself into a twisted and depraved role in THE KILLER INSIDE ME, in which he plays a 29-year-old deputy sheriff in small Texas town in the 1950’s. Outwardly, he appears to be a prototypical everyman law enforcer: modestly handsome, disarmingly charming, soft spoken and polite, and steadfastly loyal to his profession. All of that, alas, is a false façade, because what lurks beneath this congenial southern gentleman is a vindictive, cunning, sadomasochistic, and totally immoral sociopath. A lesser actor would not have been able to play such a challenging
role of paradox, but Affleck – with his creepy, mild-mannered
enunciation, sweetly baby faced mug, and stone cold and penetrating stare
– creates a terrifying portrayal of evil.
It’s all the more terrifying because he does not tip off the
audience that he is evil early on in the film: Ford is someone that occupies
coffee shops, street corners, and offices as a man of moral fiber, but
what people don’t know is that a beast resides within that has no barometer of good and
evil at all. THE KILLER INSIDE ME is on highly
fertile and strong ground with Affleck at the helm: he’s such a magnetic
and haunting screen presence here, in an under-the-radar kind of way.
The film, of course, is based on the 1952 novel of the same
name by Jim Thompson, which has been described as one of the most
brutally uncompromising crime works of its time.
Perhaps this is why so many staled attempts have occurred to adapt it to the big screen (a 1956
effort with Marlon Brando and
Marylyn Monroe was attempted, followed by a 1976 incarnation that did see the
light of day, later followed by subsequent failed endeavors in the
1980’s and 1990’s).
The inherent violence and overall degeneracy of the film’s main
character is its most unsettling element, which makes it a tough sell for
any audience, contemporary or not. This new film adaptation does something
entirely correct: it centers us within Ford’s perverse mindset, who also
serves as not only the narrator for the story, but also as a commentator
on his own profoundly dark urges and feelings.
The film begins discreetly, showing Ford at his most perfunctory at
his job: he is liked and appreciated by the townsfolk of Central City, not
to mention that his boss, Sheriff Bob Maples (a very decent Tom Bowers)
treats him like a son.
However, what they all don’t see is that Ford is cold, ruthless,
and mentally deranged.
There are hints as to why he is so demonic: it might have something
to do with multiple personality disorder, or maybe more with sexual
deviancy during his childhood, or a mother that was anything but motherly to
him.
Despite all of this, Ford has an unhealthy penchant for killing. His thirst for blood reaches a
climax when Chester Conway (Ned Beatty) asks Ford to chase away a whore
named Joyce (Jessica Alba, not bad, but more than a bit out of her element
here) that has formed ties with his son.
Ford sees multiple opportunities to both make some quick money
and to settle an old score that he has with Conway.
His first meeting with Joyce does not go well: she begins to slap
and beat him after he informs her to leave, after which he forcibly grabs
her and begins to mercilessly whip her bare behind with his belt strap.
Creepily enough, both of them like the exchange (although the
script never really fully explains why Joyce enjoys being slashed to a
purplish pulp) and begin a sexual fling involving bondage and all sorts of sordid games. One night Ford finalizes his wicked
plan: He maliciously beats Joyce to death with his fists and when
Conway’s son enters he shoots him with Joyce’s gun, hoping to make it
look like a lover’s spat between the pair gone horribly afoul.
Initially, Ford’s plan is well executed as he builds a solid
alibi for himself while plausibly making it appear that ample motives by
Joyce and her lover were the root causes.
He also maintains a phony relationship with Amy Stanton (Kate
Hudson, straining a bit to find a path for her role) to keep his cover.
However, forces conspire to reveal Ford for the killer he is:
A labor leader (a rock solid Elias Koteas) and a county attorney
(Simon Baker) have specific reasons to suspect Ford as the guilty man,
and as the local authorities begin to dissect the innocence of Ford the
more he descends into madness to the point where the only way out is to
frame and kill more people at the same time. THE KILLER INSIDE ME
was directed by Michael Winterbottom, the highly prolific and versatile English
filmmaker, and he frames the film with stylish and beautifully composed
images (complimented greatly by Marcel Zyskind’s lush and crisp cinematography).
Winterbottom also keeps the film’s pacing effectively low key,
which has the effect of keeping unsuspecting viewers off center,
especially when the film takes decidedly morbid detours into Ford’s
disturbingly murderous psyche.
And, as stated, we also have Affleck’s hypnotizing and chilling
performance as Ford, and it's noteworthy that Winterbottom and Affleck
present this man – like most killers – as a person that does not
understand that he’s evil or has committed any wrongdoing.
Ford has no regrets for his actions, nor does he exhibit any control
over them.
He’s just a pathetic creature
without a conscience. Despite
my aforementioned praise, I nonetheless had some real issues with THE KILLER INSIDE OF ME
that kept me at a real distance with the material; the film is both
enthralling and exasperating. Firstly,
many critics have called the film a rich film noir, but Winterbottom does
not shoot it as a noir at all: Ford’s
world is shot with brightly lit exteriors and bright, sun-drenched
compositions, which is far from the shadowy milieu of classic noir.
Secondly, Winterbottom’s tonal choices are far, far too whimsical
and playful at times considering the cynical corruption and dreariness of the material. Some of his choices – like using an offbeat musical score
and lively period songs to comment on the action – makes it feel more
like he is ironically commenting on the film’s psychopathic character
as opposed to simply given us an unfiltered portal into his stomach-churning
methodology. Thirdly,
Winterbottom’s attempts to flesh out the psychological rationale of
Ford’s mental state is never fully or satisfactorily developed: it’s
hinted at here and there, but only haphazardly. Something
also needs to be mentioned about the wanton, brutal violence in the film.
THE KILLER INSIDE OF ME became a lightning rod of heated
controversy earlier this year, especially for its infamous scene where
Ford smashes his fist over and over and over again into Joyce’s face in
savagely unflinching detail. On
one hand, Winterbottom, I think, is trying to dissect movie violence away
from its glamorized extremes and show it at its most nauseating and real.
Yet, consider this: Ford’s victims are both men and women, but
Winterbottom seems to display a distressing level of focus on showing – in
horrifically graphic and sustained detail – the attacks on the women,
but when it comes to his male victims, most of their fates are shown off
camera. Compounding this is
the fact that the female victims – played by Alba and Hudson – are
paper thin personas in the story that are not developed further beyond the
point of being figures for Ford to tortuously abuse. Is
Winterbottom being excessively and cheaply exploitative here?
I don’t think that his intentions were to do so, but the
resulting film has the unintentional side effect of making it come off as
just that. I have never been
a prude when it comes to film violence and have often staunchly defended
its place, but the prolonged, in-your-face barbarism perpetrated towards
women in THE KILLER INSIDE ME seems somewhat gratuitous, unnecessary, and
sensationalistic in hindsight. That’s
not the singular problem with this adaptation, though, especially if you
consider that, as previously stated, it’s a film noir that’s not
presented as noir, is too whimsical for its own good at times, and has too
many undeveloped characters (Bill Pullman shows up and then abruptly
leaves at one point) and subplots involving union problems, Ford’s
childhood, and his intervention in one young lad’s legal troubles that
do not culminate in a believable manner at all.
What we are left with is a film of polarizing contradictions:
Winterbottom is a great director (see 24 HOUR
PARTY PEOPLE, A MIGHTY HEART and TRISTRAM
SHANDY A COCK AND BULL STORY) and has made a great looking film,
not to mention that Affleck gives an Oscar worthy turn.
Lamentably, that’s not
enough to elevate THE KILLER INSIDE ME above a work that’s fiendishly
inconsistent, if not more than a bit off-putting at times considering the
obvious talent on display. |
||
|
||