AFTER Josephine Langford as Tessa Young / Hero Fiennes Tiffin as Hardin Scott / Selma Blair as Carol Young / Jennifer Beals as Karen Gibson / Peter Gallagher as Ken Scott Directed by Jenny Gage / Written by Susan McMartin, based on the book by Anna Todd |
|
||||
The new young adult romance drama AFTER is an adaptation of a novel of the same name by Anna Todd that's so insipidly scripted that one has to question how the book version even saw the publishing light of day. It
tells a story of hopeless mediocrity and numbing predictability about a
young "nice girl" college freshman that finds herself falling
for a "bad boy" that has multiple issues.
The premise alone is hardly anything new and has been explored countless
times before in other similar genre films that it frankly
inspires migraines just thinking about it. This leaves only one
thing that
could have saved this enterprise from being wholeheartedly and instantly
disposable: Two likeable lead actors that have superb chemistry.
Regrettably, this element is completely vacant in
AFTER, which results in a film that feels like one endurance test of a
slog to sit through for anyone outside of its target demographic audience. The
"good girl" in question is Tessa (Josephine Langford), a full of
life and wide eyed teen that's about to start her first year at college.
The film opens with her mother (a seriously slumming it Selma
Blair) and her boyfriend, Noah (Dylan Arnold) dropping her off at campus
for her first day, and upon arrival Tessa is introduced to her edgy
roommate (Khadijha Red Thunder), who superficially looks like bad news and
instantly turns both Tessa and her mother off.
Of course, Noah is one of those super positive nice guys that consoles Tessa as only he can, which leads one to surmise
with reasonable accuracy that, within the first half of this story, that
Tessa will royally cheat on this guy with some hunky new college suitor
that's Noah's polar personality opposite.
Well, from the opening sections of AFTER it becomes abundantly
clear that poor and well meaning Noah will be dead meat on a stick in
terms of factoring into Tessa's romantic life moving forward.
Unsurprisingly
enough, Tessa has a weird and creepy meet cute with the aforementioned
"bad boy" in Hardin (Hero Fiennes Tiffin, the nephew of Joseph
and Ralph Fiennes) and within seconds of being introduced this dude seems
less like a flesh and blood human being and more like a sullen faced
Calvin Klein underwear model. He has the hair, the chiseled jaw line, the broodingly
intense stare, and - wait for it! - he wears a leather jacket
(instant bad boy and swoon factor) and - wait for it again! - he's
hyper literate and intelligent, who manages to have a rather spirited
argument about the themes of PRIDE AND PREJUDICE with Tessa during a later
literature classroom debate. Hardin
isn't just some dumb jock with a killer bod and a hauntingly handsome
mug....he also likes books and seems like Tessa's intellectual equal. After
a few awkward encounters, Tessa and Hardin start to bond, and their
connection grows deeper during a party sequence, during which time the
pair and their mutual friends engage in a match of Truth or Dare, and
Tessa is dared to - gasp! - make out with Hardin (oooooohh the
tension!). She walks out on
the pouty faced 19th Century literary expert, but then the pair seem
inexplicably drawn towards one another, which culminates with a skinny
dipping rendezvous at a local lake, showcasing both of them letting their
guards down to succumb to their burning adolescent desires (but not in a
heavy and hard R-rated kind of way...this film is a tame PG-13).
The more time Tessa spends with Hardin the more she grows to
realize that his cool facade harbors a soft hearted sensitive type on the
inside, and he later opens up to her about some of his deepest
insecurities and fears. And,
he's deep (did I tell you already that he's a tattoo covered 19th Century
literature expert?), but just when things are going swimmingly (no pun
intended) for the pair, Hardin's troubled past comes to the forefront - as
well as a would-be shocking reveal - that threatens the pair's future
happiness. Okay,
one of the biggest problems with AFTER - kind of akin to the FIFTY
SHADES series, but much tamer - is that the central romance contained within
is decidedly high on the skin crawling creepiness factor.
Tessa falls alarmingly easy for this complete stranger, mostly
because she discovers a copy of WUTHERING HEIGHTS in his bedroom after
that botched Truth or Dare game, which in her mind means that he's a-okay
and not damaged goods, and is justifiably doable because they share a
passion for good books. Oy
vey. Complicating things is
Tessa as a character, and all throughout AFTER I couldn't decide whether
she was simply stupid or just a thoroughly dislikeable person...or both. She's with an apparent good young man in Noah, but he doesn't
wow her sexually, leading to her cheating on him with Hardin, who she
confides in later for making her feel things that Noah could not...and
only after a few days. If the
mission of AFTER was to make us hate its main character...then mission
accomplished. The
film is also paradoxically populated by what it thinks are intelligent
people that just so happen to act idiotically.
On top of Tessa's unbelievable ability to fall in love with Hardin
within an inexcusably short period of time, other characters like her
mother behave in manners that strain modest credulity.
Take the moment when she discovers to her horror Tessa making out
with Hardin in her dorm room. Now,
this should rightfully anger her because her daughter is supposed to be with
Noah, but is now with this stranger, but then she completely flies off the
handle and venomously lashes out that Tessa will be "cut off" is
she stays with his guy ("Can't you see? You're
throwing your college career away! I'm cutting you off!").
Blair's mother says this within 60 seconds of meeting Hardin.
On what plane of normal, earthbound reality do mother-daughter
conversations like this exist? Blair is a great actress that's unfortunately given
extraordinarily corny dialogue and a wretched written character to
harness. The
performances overall are kind of an embarrassment too, especially from
Langford, who's so flat and monotone throughout the film that it comes off
like she's sleepwalking throughout every scene she occupies.
She looks great, but simply has very little in the way of on-screen
charisma. Hero Fiennes Tiffin perhaps comes off a bit better
and seems like a more seasoned performer, but his work here is more about
posturing than fully forming an authentic persona with past trauma and
hidden pains. There's some
potentially juicy subplots involving his strained relationship with his
family that are introduced, and then are never developed further or with
any substantially compelling arcs. And
then there's the film's late breaking "dark secret" that is scandalously
revealed, and the end result is so corny and hackneyed that
a "it was all just a dream" moment would have been infinitely
more agreeable to help drum up some dramatic conflict before we get the
unavoidable happy ending where both parties make up. I've read a lot of people online calling this film FIFTY SHADES light, which is doubling insulting, seeing as that film trilogy was so putrid that any usage of its name to prop up another film property seems like a foolhardy mistake of word of mouth advertising. AFTER and the FIFTY SHADES series are alike in the sense that they're about good girls finding themselves in toxic relationships with men that are absolutely no good for them. Beyond that - and the fact that there's no kinky sex in AFTER - the films could not be anymore different. AFTER is obnoxious to watch because of how thinly written and weakly acted it is, and you'll be hard pressed to find a more dramatically shallow young adult film all year. The end of AFTER even hints at future installments to come. Films this bad shouldn't make those promises to viewers. |
|||||
|
|
|||||